Pixar vs. Dreamworks
The differences between the two animation studios approaches to film making.<< Previous | EatLiver.com | Next >>
Funniest T-Shirts on Earth |
Sad and Useless Humor Blog |
Funny GIF Animations |
Get Smart Daily |
Humor Bomb |
Dumbest Gadgets Ever Made
AnonAnon (Thursday, 2 Apr 2009) Reply I am more amazed at the fact that someone actually noticed it and went through the trouble of making the picture. bugs (Thursday, 2 Apr 2009) Reply its scarily true!! they think of concepts first them faces and the trivial stuff dream works catch a wake up!! Spidercega (Friday, 21 Aug 2009) PIXAR RULES!!! Pixar = Garbage (Thursday, 2 Apr 2009) Reply What about "A Bug's Life" and "Finding Nemo"? Animals doing things that animals normally don't do. And what about "Cars"? Cars doing things that cars normally don't do. I think "Cars" is the worst movie I have ever seen. God is it bad. I think it gave me cancer. N!D (Friday, 3 Apr 2009) OMG - you are actually taking this seriously!!! BTW I always found that when one make a film about ants, the other one does, ants, animals, fish etc yada yada. anonymous (Friday, 4 Dec 2009) I completely get your logic that Pixar is garbage because Cars might have gotten cancer from it and God it is bad. Huh.. (Thursday, 2 Apr 2009) Reply So..every dreamworks character is a stroke victim with no control over one side of their face....I never knew that. Lardo (Friday, 3 Apr 2009) Reply And THIS is why i want to work at pixar when i graduate collage.. dreamwork's characters are furries and always look uncertain of thier existance... harrumph (Saturday, 4 Apr 2009) Reply If Pixar is so witty and original why are they stealing ideas? "Monster Inc." is just a rip-off from "Ahh Real Monsters" if you ask me. Nea (Saturday, 4 Apr 2009) Reply All those faces are of male animals, the females always have long eyelashes!! viewer (Saturday, 4 Apr 2009) Actually, the hippopotamus is female. Long eyelashes indeed. fff (Sunday, 5 Apr 2009) Reply from this pile only Over the hedge and madagascar was half normal. Schrek no matter how successful financially was kind of lame and weak humour imo Spacetree (Wednesday, 8 Jul 2009) I'm pretty sure most people would HIGHLY disagree with you, both in terms of financial and critical success (especially since the first Shrek won an academy award). Plus, I don't know if you noticed but Kung Fu Panda was huge. Originally the Best Animated Film award had some slim pickins to choose from (i.e. Pixar movie and the two other animated films that came out). But with about 7-8 or so a year coming out right now, to be nominated actually means something, and Kung Fu Panda made the bar. Dreamworks has had some derivative stinkers (i.e. Over the Hedge), but don't dismiss all of them. ??? (Sunday, 5 Apr 2009) Reply I don't get it. The way all these characters grin doesn't look similar. The face in the picture is the face of that bee spoken by Jerry Seinfeld. -___- (Sunday, 5 Apr 2009) not funny Sven (Wednesday, 8 Apr 2009) Reply Walked past the poster for Dreamworks latest the other day, Monsters vs Aliens or sth. Guess: what the bug-headed scientist in the middle front does just. That. Face. asdf (Saturday, 11 Apr 2009) i must see this KUNGFU (Wednesday, 15 Apr 2009) Reply I don't care what anyone says, especially not this Ad. Kung Fu Panda is the best movie in the World. Bam. KUUUNGG FUUU!!! p_m (Thursday, 16 Apr 2009) it had no plot, no humour, no dynamics. nothing. hell, it did not even have a half decent moral message. Elliott (Thursday, 11 Jun 2009) Reply Holy crap, it's true! (And I think saw that Dreamworks face in Monsters vs Aliens, too...) Just watch, Dreamworks is gonna edit this face right out of their future works. Or maybe not. McLupus (Monday, 31 Aug 2009) Reply ...and you can see that same faceexpression in Disneyfilms... Example: ¤Alladin: Both Alladin and the genie does it a few times... ¤Toy Story ¤Finding Nemo And all other Disney C.A.-movies, so what is point in this pic??? |
